(hidden) gneWzf7F3

words:	0 + 239 = 239
last update:

Linked Mentions (3 in 2 pages)

November 17th, 2021 (2)
- {{[[TODO]]}} (hidden) nUvnb296q [[(hidden) gneWzf7F3]] #[[(hidden) jOMmlCP4S]]
  - (hidden) 8juA_RhD_
- {{[[TODO]]}} (hidden) sC2tE89Fs [[(hidden) gneWzf7F3]] #[[(hidden) jOMmlCP4S]]
  - (hidden) PNsxGrk6P
  - (hidden) 4rAlqgjdj
  - (hidden) CFnJlIoyB
  - (hidden) _nzjSVKm9
December 5th, 2021 (1)
- [[(hidden) gneWzf7F3]]
  - oh idea - just use `joinWith("\n")([ "line1", "line2", ])` to make it way clearer!
  - also, now it looks like a taggedTemplateLiteral call, i.e. we could do
    - ```javascript joinWith("\n")` line 1. line 2. left spacing does not matter because we could just trim it? ```
    - oh but wait, we again have to use the `${}` calls. nope
    - aight, then we could at least make it optional to pass in an array, and instead take in `...strings: string[]` instead:
      - ```javascript joinWith("\n")([ "line 1", "line 2", "line 3" ]) // same would be (notice - no array): joinWith("\n")( "line 1", "line 2", "line 3" ) ```
      - {{[[TODO]]}} yep. let's do it.
      - {{[[TODO]]}} refactor [[codemods]]