(hidden) _d7I12UTL | notes | kipras melnikovas

Linked Mentions (1 in 1 page)

January 6th, 2022 (1)
- re:: [[(hidden) _d7I12UTL]]
  - oh fuck another #[[(hidden) jOMmlCP4S]] while thinking about this -- if we setup roam for further automations, e.g. [[creating jira issues / sub-tasks from roam's TODOs]]
    - WAIT i thought you'd have like a custom server and use [[roam-traverse-graph]] to parse the graph, and then have like a frontend dashboard SPA or whatever to confirm stuff. BUT hold up, we have [[roam/js]]. we can get rid of literally all of the #bs, and do everything directly in [[roam]] 🤯 for API calls to some endpoints, sure could use a server, or e.g. lambda functions. but perhaps roam directly is also fine, if we can securely keep secrets stored?
      - [[(hidden) DY6wPnICE]]
        
        [[roam]] as the personal "[[(hidden) pCdH3SJhT]]" / no-code / automations platform???
        
        re:: "no-code" - lol, ofc you'd have to code up the [[(hidden) AqlNqCYG6]]s, but then you can share them and use them and everything's directly in roam. fuuuuuuuck this is [[(hidden) -MiVLWUzx]]
        
        (hidden) D1lY0CG5e:: {{[[TODO]]}} ideally you'd be able to [[self-host]] [[roam]] because at this point you'd be [[running critical infrastructure]]
        
        cc:: [[roam "enterprise"]]
        
        thought beware -- remain user-focused, never [[(hidden) 6jcY_WnAD]], [[you gotta zuck'em]], stay [[(hidden) EJItNRkJG]], do not give power to the [[professional managerial class]]
        
        {{[[TODO]]}} okay more [[(hidden) jOMmlCP4S]]s coming in from thinking about this:
        
        re:: `publicRecursive` tag @ [[export-html-pages]]
        
        maybe instead of `publicRecursive`, we need to make it a point that the purpose of this is to have everything in daily notes, and under that tag, blocks become public and end up in the page as a linked mention.
        
        so that it'd be made clear that this is the purpose of it, and not a general `publicRecursive` meta-tag. then, we'd be able to very easily detect if something is a "page collector" or whatever better name we come up with, and then e.g. the coloring stuff becomes way more precise
        
        {{[[TODO]]}} might even be useful for [[roam's multiplayer mode]] and the #[[(hidden) jOMmlCP4S]] of [["putting" things into multiple graphs]], or, rather, giving other, shared-graphs e.g. read access to some of your notes, if they're under that tag (while still being able to own them?)
        
        cc:: [[roam "enterprise"]]
        
        re:: ((wiW41Si-y))
        
        #[[(hidden) jOMmlCP4S]] / #[[(hidden) D1lY0CG5e]] for [[roam]] - would having a central place for settings, provided by the [[(hidden) AqlNqCYG6]]s / extensions, be useful?
        
        something similar to [[vscode]] i suppose
        
        thought about it because it'd likely save time / less http requests to do -- even if you have [[meta tags]], you don't need to 1. fetch your custom settings page, 2. fetch the linked references of the tags - you'd be ensured that 1. is always done & up-to-date (it's easier for roam if it itself tracks what's updated & when it is - just updates, otherwise caches)
        
        but, maybe inconvenience if you're using some other languages for the [[(hidden) AqlNqCYG6]]s (if even possible?), and in general feels less [[wild west]]-like / less [[(hidden) NWcsO1fe0]]. will see.
        
        {{[[TODO]]}} is [[re]] an [[anti-pattern]]? i.e. it becomes unclear if what you are "referring to" is from the content above, or some other page (if it's not a linked ref (of a page or a block) and just text) - you might start looking at the previous content but not find the thing that i meant to refer to, or even worse - could find something that is actually not the thing, and then get further confused. idk idk
    - re:: [[creating jira issues / sub-tasks from roam's TODOs]]
      - {{[[TODO]]}} must avoid cluttering the raw UI of [[roam]].
        
        {{[[TODO]]}} as a minimum, could have an option to `onlyEnableUnderFollowingTags: []`, but this shouldn't be used an excuse to allow trashing the UI when the option matches and we are inside a specified tag

words:	0 + 602 = 602
last update: